NBCP URBAN RENEWAL PARTNERSHIP PLAINTIFF APPELLANT v. CITY OF NEWARK DEFENDANT RESPONDENT (1998)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

NBCP URBAN RENEWAL PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Decided: October 06, 1998

Before Judges PRESSLER, BROCHIN and STEINBERG.

Donald F. Miceli, argued the cause for appellant (Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi, Stewart & Olstein, attorneys; Mr. Miceli and Richard K. Matanle, on the brief). Demetrice R. Miles, Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Michelle Hollar-Gregory, Corporation Counsel, attorney; Mr. Miles, on the brief).

The judgment of the Tax Court, based on its conclusion that the Business Retention Act, N.J.S.A. 54:4-1.13 -1.16, does not affect plaintiff's statutory service payments in lieu of taxes, is affirmed, substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Small in his decision reported at 17 N.J.Tax 59 (Tax 1997).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network