Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SIDNEY KOCH AND DOROTHY KOCH, PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT.
The judgment of the Tax Court approving the deficiency assessment of the Division of Taxation is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Crabtree in his opinion reported at 15 N.J. Tax 387 (Tax Ct.1995). In determining the adjusted basis of plaintiff's partnership interest, N.J.S.A. 54A:5-1(c) requires that at the time of sale the adjusted basis for federal income tax purposes shall be used. Judge Crabtree properly rejected the application of the tax benefit rule that certain items of income need not be recognized if they represent a reversal of prior deductions that did not result in any tax benefit. The Legislature did not extend the favorable treatment in the Subchapter S corporation context to a partnership. See N.J.S.A. 54A:5-1(p).
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 14, 1997
Court: Superior Court of New JerseyAppellate Division
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)