Steven Baril v. Harmon Law Offices, P.C. (2013)

Having considered the briefs and record submitted on appeal, we conclude that oral argument is unnecessary in this case.   See Sup.Ct. R. 18(1).   We affirm.

The plaintiff, Steven Baril, appeals an order of the superior court granting summary judgment to the defendant, Harmon Law Offices, P.C., on the plaintiffs claim of fraud and the defendant's counterclaims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, denying the plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment, and awarding the defendant its costs and attorney's fees.   He raises several arguments challenging the trial court's determinations that there was no genuine issue of material fact, and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on his claim of fraud.   He also challenges the award of attorney's fees.

On appeal, the plaintiff has the burden to demonstrate reversible error.   See Coyle v. Battles, 147 N.H. 98, 100 (2001).   We have reviewed the trial court's order, the plaintiff's challenges to it, and the record that the plaintiff has provided, and we conclude that the plaintiff has not demonstrated reversible error.

Affirmed.

Dalianis, C.J., and Hicks, Conboy, Lynn and Bassett, JJ., concurred.