Adam D. Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.H., Respondent and Appellant (2023)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

In the INTEREST OF D.H. Adam D. Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.H., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20230057

Decided: March 31, 2023

Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

[¶1] D.H. appeals from the district court's order continuing treatment. On appeal, D.H. argues the finding he is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. In mental health commitment cases, we apply the more probing clearly erroneous standard of review. Interest of Doe, 2019 ND 23, ¶ 4, 921 N.W.2d 403. We conclude the district court's findings are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network