KROGSTAD v. STATE (2023)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Jeffrey Scott KROGSTAD, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20220264

Decided: February 16, 2023

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, N.D., for petitioner and appellant; on brief. Andrew C. Eyre, Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks, N.D., for respondent and appellee; on brief.

[¶1] Jeffrey Krogstad appeals from an order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial attorney did not demand a speedy trial or secure an independent DNA test. He also asserts that the district court erred by failing to analyze whether he was prejudiced by counsel's representation. We conclude the district court's findings regarding the first prong, whether counsel's conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). Broadwell v. State, 2014 ND 6, ¶ 7, 841 N.W.2d 750 (“Courts need not address both elements of the ineffective assistance of counsel test, and if a court can dispose of the case by addressing only one element, it is encouraged to do so.”).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network