STATE v. DOGLOD (2022)

[¶1] Naike Doglod appeals a criminal judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of terrorizing and criminal trespass. She argues the evidence was insufficient to sustain her convictions. After reviewing the record, sufficient evidence supports Doglod's terrorizing and criminal trespass convictions. See State v. Johnson, 2021 ND 161, ¶ 14, 964 N.W.2d 500 (“We have reviewed the evidence in a light favorable to the verdict, considered the reasonable inferences the jury could draw from the evidence, and conclude substantial evidence was presented to the jury to warrant a conviction.”). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte