Adam Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v. T.E., Respondent and Appellant (2022)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

In the INTEREST OF T.E. Adam Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v. T.E., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20220171

Decided: July 07, 2022

Jason Van Horn, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

[¶1] T.E. appeals from an order for hospitalization and an order for involuntary treatment with prescribed medication. T.E. argues the district court erred in finding he is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. He also argues the court erred in granting the request for involuntary treatment with medication. We conclude the court's findings are not clearly erroneous. See In re S.R.B., 2013 ND 109, ¶ 7, 832 N.W.2d 42 (the more probing clearly erroneous standard of review applies to factual findings made by the district court in appeals from an order for hospitalization and treatment). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law