Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Thomas Lynn OLSEN, Defendant and Appellant
[¶1] Thomas Olsen appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. On appeal, Olsen argues the district court erred in denying his N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion regarding time as an essential element. He also argues the court's preliminary ruling on probable cause pursuant to N.D.R.Crim.P. 4, 5, and 5.1 undermines the integrity of the judicial process. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7); State v. Montplaisir, 2015 ND 237, ¶ 16, 869 N.W.2d 435 (“A defendant who is found guilty at trial may not, on appeal, challenge the district court's decision on probable cause at the preliminary hearing.”).
Per Curiam.
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 20210127
Decided: December 23, 2021
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)