In the INTEREST OF T.L.E. Ann Engel, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v. T.L.E., Respondent and Appellant
[¶1] T.L.E. appeals from an order for hospitalization and an order for involuntary treatment with medication. He argues the evidence does not support the district court's findings that he is a mentally ill individual requiring involuntary treatment with medication. We conclude the court's findings are not clearly erroneous. See Interest of B.L.S., 2006 ND 218, ¶ 10, 723 N.W.2d 395 (the clearly erroneous standard of review applies to factual findings made by the district court in N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.1 civil commitment proceedings). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Per Curiam.
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Was this helpful?