STATE v. RENNIE (2021)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Arnold Nudah RENNIE, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200307

Decided: April 14, 2021

Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.

[¶1] Arnold Rennie appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition and corruption of a minor.

[¶2] On appeal, Rennie argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to dismiss based on alleged Rule 16, N.D.R.Crim.P., discovery violations by the State. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rennie's motion to dismiss. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Per Curiam.

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network