State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.T., father, Respondent and Appellant (2020)

[¶1] J.T. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to A.T. On appeal, J.T. argues the juvenile court erred in terminating his parental rights because its findings that A.T. was deprived and the deprivation was likely to continue were clearly erroneous. We conclude the juvenile court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence, are not clearly erroneous, and support the termination of J.T.’s parental rights. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte