State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.T., father, Respondent and Appellant (2020)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

In the INTEREST OF A.T., Minor Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. A.T., child, T.T., mother, Respondents J.T., father, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20200092

Decided: May 07, 2020

Nathan A. Wersal, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Kyle R. Craig, Minot, N.D., for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

[¶1] J.T. appeals from a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to A.T. On appeal, J.T. argues the juvenile court erred in terminating his parental rights because its findings that A.T. was deprived and the deprivation was likely to continue were clearly erroneous. We conclude the juvenile court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence, are not clearly erroneous, and support the termination of J.T.’s parental rights. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network