WILBER v. SCAFF (2019)

[¶1] McKiley Wilber appeals from a district court judgment granting Sarah Scaff primary residential responsibility of their child. On appeal, Wilber argues the district court’s findings were clearly erroneous. He also argues the district court abused its discretion by allocating to him all costs of transporting the child and by not taking judicial notice of the criminal history of Scaff’s former live-in boyfriend. We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and it did not abuse its discretion. Therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen