HORST v. State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest (2019)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Scott HORST, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Charlotte HORST, Defendant and Appellant State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest

No. 20180402

Decided: April 11, 2019

William Woodworth, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee (on brief). Charlotte Horst, self-represented, defendant and appellant (on brief).

[¶1] Charlotte Horst appeals from a third amended judgment awarding a divorce and establishing primary residential responsibility, child support and parenting time of two minor children. Charlotte Horst argues the district court erred in analysis of the best interest factors relating to parenting time and primary residential responsibility, abused its discretion in denying appointed counsel, and improperly disregarded a request for an annulment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3) and (4).

[¶2] Charlotte Horst attempts to raise various constitutional and other claims, which we do not consider because her arguments were inadequately articulated, supported, and briefed. State v. Noack, 2007 ND 82, ¶ 8, 732 N.W.2d 389.

Per Curiam.

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network