Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Charles Bradford ODOM, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
[¶ 1] Charles Bradford Odom appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Odom argues the district court erred in denying his application because the recently amended N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(a)(2) is a change in substantive law that should be applied retrospectively in the interest of justice. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), see State v. Iverson, 2006 ND 193, ¶ 8, 721 N.W.2d 396 (holding a statute lessening punishment may not be applied retroactively to final convictions because it would constitute an invalid exercise by the Legislature of the executive pardoning power).
Per Curiam.
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 20180089
Decided: July 11, 2018
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)