STATE v. COLEMAN (2018)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Romez Michael COLEMAN, Jr., Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170315

Decided: February 22, 2018

Haley L. Wamstad, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Russell J. Myhre, Valley City, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

[¶1] Romez Michael Coleman, Jr., appeals from a criminal judgment for aggravated assault—domestic violence. Coleman argues the State presented insufficient evidence to sustain the guilty verdict and the district court erred in allowing testimony about two physical objects that were subject to a stipulation and order restricting their admission into evidence. Sufficient evidence exists to sustain the criminal judgment, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony about the objects. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law