Chad Fischer, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. M.E., mother, Respondent and Appellant (2018)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

IN the INTEREST OF L.S., a child Chad Fischer, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. L.S., a child; C.E., father, Respondents M.E., mother, Respondent and Appellant
In the Interest of A.E., a child Chad Fischer, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. A.E., a child; John Doe, father, Respondents M.E., mother, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20180006, No. 20180007

Decided: February 22, 2018

Pam H. Ormand, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; on brief. Daniel E. Gast, Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant; on brief.

[¶1] M.E. appeals a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights in L.S. and A.E. On appeal, M.E. argues the juvenile court clearly erred in finding that her children, L.S. and A.E., were deprived, that the deprivation was likely to continue, and that reasonable efforts were made to prevent removal of the children from the home. Because the juvenile court’s findings were not clearly erroneous, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network