SAUCEDO v. STATE (2018)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Joe Ramon SAUCEDO, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20170224

Decided: January 22, 2018

Kiara C. Kraus–Parr (argued), Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant. Jodi A. Bass (argued), Carmell F. Mattison (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorneys, and Jenna Bergman (on brief), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellee.

[¶ 1] Joe Saucedo appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Saucedo argues the district court erred in denying his application for post-conviction relief because his counsel was ineffective. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not clearly err in denying Saucedo’s application.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network