STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Christopher LOCKWOOD, Defendant and Appellant
[¶1] Christopher Lockwood appeals from three amended criminal judgments revoking his probation and resentencing him. It is unclear what Lockwood argues on appeal because his brief does not contain the minimum requirements in N.D.R.App.P. 28. Under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8), this Court may summarily affirm a judgment if the appellant's brief fails to comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8).
Per Curiam.
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Was this helpful?