Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN the INTEREST OF R.C. Ashley Peterson, L.C.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. R.C., a child, Respondent T.V., mother, C.C., father, Respondents and Appellants
[¶1] T.V. and C.C., the mother and father of R.C., appeal from a juvenile court order terminating their parental rights. The juvenile court found the child was deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation were likely to continue, and the child was suffering or would probably suffer serious harm in the future. On appeal, T.V. and C.C. argue there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a termination of their parental rights. The juvenile court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Per Curiam.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20180090
Decided: May 08, 2018
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)