State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Miguel Angel Rodriguez De La Cruz, Defendant and Appellant (2017)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Miguel Angel Rodriguez De La Cruz, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170207

Decided: December 07, 2017

Leah J. Viste, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Nicholas D. Thornton and James A. Teigland, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

1[¶] Miguel Angel Rodriguez De La Cruz appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of patronizing a minor for commercial sexual activity. On appeal, De La Cruz argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Per Curiam.

2[¶] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law