William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v. Jane Doe, Respondent and Appellant (2017)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

In the Interest of Jane Doe William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v. Jane Doe, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20170398

Decided: December 07, 2017

Leo A. Ryan, Jamestown, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Andrew Marquart, Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

1[¶] Jane Doe appeals from the district court's order entered on November 2, 2017, for continuing treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period not to exceed one year. Doe argues the district court erred in finding her mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. We conclude the court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

2[¶] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Jon J. Jensen

Per Curiam.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network