Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Reciprocal Discipline of Jesse D. Matson, a Person Admitted to the Bar of the State of North Dakota
[¶1] On August 9, 2017, the Disciplinary Board notified the Supreme Court under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(D) that it was recommending the reciprocal discipline of Jesse D. Matson, a person admitted to the bar of North Dakota.
[¶2] Matson was disbarred June 19, 2017. See Disciplinary Board v. Matson, 2017 ND 149, 897 N.W.2d 11.
[¶3] The record reflects that the Supreme Court of Minnesota filed its Order on January 18, 2017, disbarring Matson for misappropriation of client funds, failure to safe keep property, improper fee agreements, dishonesty, neglectful communication, communication failure, and noncooperation with a disciplinary proceeding.
[¶4] The record reflects that no current address is known for Matson. In an affidavit filed by Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, efforts to locate and serve Matson were outlined. Therefore, service was made on the Clerk of the Supreme Court under Admission to Practice R. 1. On May 10, 2017, Disciplinary Counsel served notice under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(B) that a certified copy of an order of discipline entered by the Supreme Court of Minnesota was received. The notice informed Matson he had 30 days to file any claim that imposition of the identical discipline in North Dakota would be unwarranted and the reasons for the claim. No response was received from Matson.
[¶5] The Disciplinary Board considered the matter. On August 9, 2017, the Board recommended Matson be disbarred.
[¶6] The Court considered the matter, and
[¶7] ORDERED, that Matson is DISBARRED from the practice of law in North Dakota, effective immediately.
[¶8] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Matson must comply with N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 6.3 regarding notice.
[¶9] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that reinstatement is governed by N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.5.
[¶10] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Per Curiam.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20170305
Decided: September 18, 2017
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)