KANTOLA v. KANTOLA (2026)

[¶1] Robert Kantola appeals from a divorce judgment distributing the parties’ marital property. Sandra Kantola requests attorney's fees and costs for a frivolous appeal under N.D.R.App.P. 38.

[¶2] Robert Kantola argues that the district court did not analyze the Ruff-Fischer factors when dividing the marital estate. The court's order contradicts his assertion and shows that the court considered every factor. He also argues under the partition statute, N.D.C.C. § 32-16-01, and the doctrine of unjust enrichment that the court clearly erred in the property division. Any reliance on these theories is misplaced because this is a divorce action governed by N.D.C.C. ch. 14-05. See Berger v. Repnow, 2025 ND 25, ¶ 5, 16 N.W.3d 452.

[¶3] We conclude that this appeal is frivolous. Buchholz v. Buchholz, 2022 ND 203, ¶ 43, 982 N.W.2d 275. We award Sandra double costs and attorney's fees in the amount of $1,000. Sandra did not submit a statement of fees. When a party requests more than a token amount of attorney's fees on appeal, the request should be accompanied by an affidavit or statement documenting the work performed. See United Bank of Bismarck v. Young, 401 N.W.2d 517, 519 n.1 (N.D. 1987); In re Est. of Nelson, 2018 ND 118, ¶ 13, 910 N.W.2d 856. When no such documentation accompanies the request, we may award a fixed amount of attorney's fees at our discretion. See In re Est. of Nelson, 2018 ND 118, ¶ 14, 910 N.W.2d 856 (awarding $500 absent supporting documentation); see also United Valley Bank v. Lamb, 2003 ND 149, ¶ 5, 669 N.W.2d 117 (awarding $1,000 toward the bank's attorney's fees without supporting documentation).

[¶4] We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). We award Sandra Kantola double costs and attorney's fees in the amount of $1,000.

Per Curiam.

[¶5] Lisa Fair McEvers, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen Douglas A. Bahr