WRIGHT ON BEHALF OF v. HOLMES (2025)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Jessica WRIGHT, and Jessica Wright ON BEHALF OF G.W., Petitioners and Appellees v. Terica HOLMES, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20250179

Decided: December 18, 2025

Jared W. Gietzen, Dickinson, N.D., for petitioners and appellees; submitted on brief. Terica Holmes, self-represented, Dickinson, N.D., respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

[¶1] Terica Holmes appeals from a disorderly conduct restraining order. She argues the restraining order violates her constitutional rights because it is “retaliatory and malicious.” She also contends the restraining order rested on “untrue hearsay.” Holmes's brief does not contain a statement of facts, specify a standard of review, or provide citations to the record showing the issues preserved for review. See N.D.R.App.P. 28(b) (setting forth minimum brief requirements). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8) because Holmes's brief does not meet the minimum requirements.

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law