Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
In the INTEREST OF J.L., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.L., a child; G.L., mother, Respondents and
J.L., father, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of J.L., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.L., a child; G.L., mother, Respondents and
J.L., father, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of J.L., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.L., a child; G.L., mother, Respondents and
J.L., father, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of J.L., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.L., a child; G.L., mother, Respondents and J.L., father, Respondent and Appellant
[¶1] J.L. appeals from a juvenile court order for disposition placing his four minor children, J.L., J.L., J.L., and J.L., in the custody of the Director of the Grand Forks County Human Service Zone for a period of no more than 12 months. He argues the juvenile court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence his children were in need of protection and in finding the Grand Forks Human Service Zone engaged in active efforts to place three of the children in an Indian home as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act.
[¶2] We conclude the juvenile court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. See In re T.H., 2012 ND 38, ¶ 27, 812 N.W.2d 373 (“Whether a child is deprived [now, ‘in need of protection’] is a finding of fact, and a juvenile court's findings of fact will not be reversed on appeal unless they are clearly erroneous.”); see also Interest of K.S.D., 2017 ND 289, ¶¶ 17, 20, 904 N.W.2d 479 (a demonstration that active efforts were made requires clear and convincing evidence of remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of an Indian family were attempted and unsuccessful). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Per Curiam.
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20250128, No. 20250129, No. 20250130, No. 20250131
Decided: September 25, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)