Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
INTEREST OF J.O., Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.O., child; D.O., father; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and
A.M.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant Interest of L.O., Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. L.O., child; D.O., father; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and
A.M.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant Interest of A.O., Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. A.O., child; D.O., father; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and
A.M.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant Interest of A.O., Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. A.O., child; D.O., father; Barb Oliger, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and A.M.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
[¶1] A.M.O., the mother of the four children in these consolidated cases, appeals from a juvenile court order holding the children are in need of protection. On appeal, she argues the court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence establishes the children are in need of protection.
[¶2] Following a trial in October 2024, the judicial referee concluded the children were in need of protection. A.M.O. requested a district judge review the referee's order. After conducting a de novo review under N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 13, § 11, the district judge adopted the referee's findings and order.
[¶3] After reviewing the record and the juvenile court's findings, we conclude the court's findings are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Per Curiam.
[¶4] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 20250036, No. 20250037, No. 20250038, No. 20250039
Decided: July 03, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)