Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kyle Ruben SANCHEZ, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
[¶1] Kyle Sanchez appeals from a judgment denying his application for postconviction relief. Sanchez argues the district court erred in denying his application, claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues his trial counsel was not diligent in his representation or investigation of the case and did not properly review all of the pretrial information or interview witnesses to present an adequate defense. After an evidentiary hearing, the court found the errors alleged by Sanchez amounted to trial strategy decisions and were not errors so egregious that he was not afforded counsel. The court found Sanchez failed to establish his trial counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and there was a reasonable probability that, but for the alleged errors of counsel, the outcome of trial would have been different.
[¶2] We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding Sanchez failed to establish his trial counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prong one of the Strickland test. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). Truelove v. State, 2020 ND 142, ¶ 11, 945 N.W.2d 272 (“Our precedent for evaluating whether a particular trial strategy resulted in an ineffective assistance of counsel is well established: Trial strategy is the attorney's province and on appeal, we do not second guess matters of trial tactics, such as the decision to call certain witnesses, hire private investigators, or how to question certain witnesses.” (cleaned up)).
Per Curiam.
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20240173
Decided: November 21, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)