Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ronald Wayne WOOTAN, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
[¶1] Ronald Wootan appeals from an order denying his postconviction relief application entered after the district court held an evidentiary hearing on remand. See Wootan v. State, 2023 ND 151, ¶ 11, 994 N.W.2d 347 (remanding because genuine issue of material fact existed on claim asserting trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by stating sentences would run concurrently). The court on remand found Wootan's trial counsel's representation of him was reasonable and withdrawal of his guilty plea was not necessary to correct a manifest injustice. Wootan argues the court erred in denying his application, claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel before entering his guilty plea.
[¶2] “When a defendant pleads guilty on the advice of counsel, the defendant may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of the guilty plea.” Jung v. State, 2024 ND 94, ¶ 11, 6 N.W.3d 853 (citation omitted). “The [district] court has discretion in finding whether a manifest injustice necessitating the withdrawal of a guilty plea exists, and we review the court's decision for abuse of discretion.” State v. Rangel, 2024 ND 96, ¶ 6, 6 N.W.3d 860 (citation omitted). Findings of fact made in a postconviction relief proceeding are subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. Urrabazo v. State, 2024 ND 67, ¶ 6, 5 N.W.3d 521. After a review of the record, we conclude the district court's findings of facts are not clearly erroneous, the court did not err in determining Wootan failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, and the court did not abuse its discretion by not allowing him to withdraw his guilty plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
Per Curiam.
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20240025
Decided: July 18, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)