STATE v. HEINTZ (2024)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Kyle Martin HEINTZ, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20230382-20230385

Decided: May 02, 2024

Kathryn R. Jund, Assistant State's Attorney, and Victoria J.M. Christian, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Kevin McCabe, Dickinson, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

[¶1] Kyle Martin Heintz appeals from orders for revocation of probation entered in four criminal cases. He argues the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to continue the sentencing portion of his revocation proceedings. After review of the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to continue. We summarily affirm the orders for revocation of probation under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network