Adam D. Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v. R.K., Respondent and Appellant (2024)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

In the INTEREST OF R.K. Adam D. Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v. R.K., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20240062

Decided: March 07, 2024

Jason Van Horn, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Andrew Marquart, Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

[¶1] R.K. appeals from a district court's order continuing his treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period not to exceed one year. On appeal, R.K. argues the district court erred by finding clear and convincing evidence that he is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. In mental health commitment cases we review a district court's factual findings under the clearly erroneous standard. In re Doe, 2019 ND 23, ¶ 4, 921 N.W.2d 403. We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding clear and convincing evidence that R.K. is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network