Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Paxton Benjamin HEYWOOD, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
[¶1] Paxton Heywood appeals from an order denying his application for postconviction relief. Heywood argues the district court erred in denying his postconviction relief application. He claims he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to discredit a witness, failed to call an expert witness, and failed to ensure a witness testified at trial. After a hearing, at which Heywood's trial counsel testified, the court found Heywood's trial counsel made trial strategy decisions and his representation did not fall below an objective standard of reasonableness. The court also held Heywood failed to establish a reasonable probability that, but for the alleged errors of counsel, the results of the proceeding would have been different in this case.
[¶2] We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding Heywood did not prove his counsel's conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Garcia v. State, 2004 ND 81, ¶ 8, 678 N.W.2d 568 (quoting Breding v. State, 1998 ND 170, ¶ 9, 584 N.W.2d 493) (“An unsuccessful trial strategy does not make defense counsel's assistance defective, and we will not second-guess counsel's defense strategy through the distorting effects of hindsight.”). We need not address the second element of Heywood's ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Broadwell v. State, 2014 ND 6, ¶ 7, 841 N.W.2d 750 (“Courts need not address both elements of the ineffective assistance of counsel test, and if a court can dispose of the case by addressing only one element, it is encouraged to do so.”). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Per Curiam.
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20230223
Decided: December 28, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)