BULLER v. BULLER (2023)

[¶1] Abigail Buller appeals the judgment entered by the district court in this divorce proceeding. She argues the court erred by awarding primary residential responsibility of the parties’ minor child to Matthew Buller. She also argues the court erred in its valuation and distribution of marital property. An order regarding primary residential responsibility and valuation and distribution of the marital estate is subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. See Berdahl v. Berdahl, 2022 ND 136, ¶¶ 6, 9, 977 N.W.2d 294; Carlson v. Carlson, 2020 ND 57, ¶ 6, 940 N.W.2d 662. We conclude the findings regarding primary residential responsibility and valuation and distribution of property were not induced by an erroneous view of the law, there is evidence in the record to support the findings, and, after a review of the entire record, we are not left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Per Curiam.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr