RUIZ LEDEZMA v. STATE (2023)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Sergio RUIZ LEDEZMA, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20230055

Decided: September 14, 2023

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant. Amanda R. Engelstad, State's Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

[¶1] Sergio Ruiz Ledezma appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief.

[¶2] On appeal, Ruiz Ledezma argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his oral motions for continuance made at the post-conviction relief hearing. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ruiz Ledezma's motions for continuance. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Per Curiam.

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law