Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Danielle GREYBULL, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.
[¶ 1] Danielle GreyBull appeals from the trial court's order dismissing her application for post-conviction relief. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
[¶ 2] In 1997, GreyBull was convicted of manslaughter in the stabbing death of Charlene Yellow Bear. This Court affirmed the conviction in State v. Greybull, 1998 ND 102, 579 N.W.2d 161. GreyBull, acting pro se, filed two successive applications for post-conviction relief. This appeal arises from the trial court's dismissal of the second of those applications.
[¶ 3] The record in this case fails to establish the clerk of district court informed GreyBull of her right to apply for counsel under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-03. Section 29-32.1-03(6), N.D.C.C., states:
If the applicant is not represented by counsel, the clerk shall notify the applicant that assistance of counsel may be available to persons unable to obtain counsel. The clerk shall also inform the applicant of the procedure for obtaining counsel.
In State v. DeCoteau, we held this statute imposes a mandatory obligation upon the clerk of district court and the clerk's failure to notify an applicant of her statutory right to apply for counsel and of the procedure for obtaining counsel is reversible error. 464 N.W.2d 605, 606 (N.D.1990). This procedural issue is dispositive of the appeal and, therefore, we do not decide the substantive issues raised by GreyBull.
[¶ 4] The order dismissing GreyBull's second application for post-conviction relief is reversed. We remand and instruct the clerk of court to notify GreyBull that assistance of counsel may be available to her and to inform her of the procedure she may use to obtain counsel under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-03.
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 5] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, DALE V. SANDSTROM, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 990280.
Decided: January 19, 2000
Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)