Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Q.J.
¶ 1 For the reasons stated in In re J.R., ––– N.C. ––––, 2022-NCSC-127, ––– S.E.2d ––––, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM.
Justices HUDSON, MORGAN, and EARLS dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Earls’ dissenting opinion in In re J.R., ––– N.C. ––––, 2022-NCSC-127, ––– .S.E.2d ––––.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 309A21
Decided: December 16, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)