DOBO v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF WILMINGTON (2003)

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

G. William DOBO and wife, Barbara B. Dobo, Petitioners, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the CITY OF WILMINGTON and City of Wilmington, Respondents.

No. 256A02.

Decided: February 28, 2003

Kenneth A. Shanklin and Matthew A. Nichols Wilmington, for petitioner-appellants. Thomas C. Pollard, City Attorney, and Dolores M. Williams, Assistant City Attorney, for respondent-appellees.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, New Hanover County, for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law