IN RE: MITCHELL (2002)

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

IN RE: MITCHELL, M., a minor child, d.o.b. 12/24/94. In the Matter of Mitchell, K., a minor child, d.o.b. 01/16/98. In the Matter of Mitchell, K., a minor child, d.o.b. 02/06/96.

No. 127A02.

Decided: October 04, 2002

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C., by Stuart A. Brock, Winston-Salem, for appellant Guardian ad Litem. Charles W. McKeller, Brevard, for respondent-appellee Cynthia Chatman.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion.

REVERSED.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network