HAYTHE v. HAYTHE (2025)

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Debbie HAYTHE v. James HAYTHE, Jr.

No. 158A24-1

Decided: December 12, 2025

No brief filed for pro se plaintiff-appellee. Plumides, Romano, & Johnson, P.C., Charlotte, by Richard B. Johnson, for defendant-appellant.

Defendant appealed from an order of the district court entered on 17 January 2023. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part but remanded for additional findings related to the calculation of alimony and attorney fees. Haythe v. Haythe, 293 N.C. App. 497, 510, 901 S.E.2d 833 (2024). Defendant appealed to this Court based on the dissent in part at the Court of Appeals, Haythe, 293 N.C. App. at 510, 901 S.E.2d 833 (Tyson, J., dissenting), and we granted defendant's petition for discretionary review of additional issues.

Having considered the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the record, and defendant's brief, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in that decision and conclude that defendant's petition for discretionary review of additional issues was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network