PINTACUDA v. ZUCKEBERG (2004)

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Jay T. PINTACUDA and wife Lucretia Pintacuda v. Jack ZUCKEBERG.

No. 509A03.

Decided: April 02, 2004

Roberts & Stevens, P.A., by Jacqueline D. Grant and Kenneth R. Hunt, Asheville, for plaintiffs-appellees. Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes, & Davis, P.A., by Dale A. Curriden and Vaughn S. Monroe, Asheville, for defendant-appellant.

As to the issue on direct appeal, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to the additional issues was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network