Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Shakerria BRASWELL, Plaintiff, v. MONARCH AUTO RENTALS, INC. d/b/a Rent a Wreck and David Lanzer, Defendants.
¶ 1 Plaintiff seeks appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff filed suit against defendants raising multiple claims. The parties engaged in discovery and filed cross motions for summary judgment. On 5 November 2021, the trial court filed an Order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and dismissing plaintiff's claims with prejudice.
¶ 2 This Court acquires jurisdiction through compliance with Rule 3 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Dogwood Dev. & Mgmt. Co. v. White Oak Transp. Co., 362 N.C. 191, 197–98, 657 S.E.2d 361, 365 (2008). Rule 3 sets out the requirements for appellate jurisdiction in this Court, including the requirements of “filing a notice of appeal with the clerk of superior court” and timeliness of that filing. N.C.R. App. P. 3(a). When a notice of appeal lacks a file stamp, this Court may not “assume” timeliness of appeal. Bradley v. Cumberland County, 262 N.C. App. 376, 382, 822 S.E.2d 416, 420 (2018). In such a situation, this Court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal. Id.; see also Booth v. Utica Mut. Ins., 308 N.C. 187, 189, 301 S.E.2d 98, 99–100 (1983) (“Failure to give timely notice of appeal in compliance with ․ Rule 3 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure is jurisdictional, and an untimely attempt to appeal must be dismissed.”).
¶ 3 Plaintiff's notice of appeal lacks any file stamp. Without this file stamp, this Court is unable to determine if the notice of appeal was filed with the superior court clerk, and when it was filed. This is a violation of Rule 3 and prevents this Court from reviewing the appeal on its merits. Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
DISMISSED.
Report per Rule 30(e).
GORE, Judge.
Chief Judge STROUD and Judge MURPHY concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. COA22-442
Decided: December 06, 2022
Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)