Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James Lee PEGRAM.
This appeal arises from an adjudication on a petition filed by Chatham County Department of Social Services (DSS) to have a minor child declared to be “dependent” within the meaning of N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7A–517(13) (1995). On 20 January 1999, the trial court adjudicated the child to be a dependent child within the meaning of the statute, and gave DSS temporary custody of the child pending a final disposition on 3 February 1999.
Mary and Ronnie Pegram (respondents), the parents of the child, filed notice of appeal on 5 March 1999. Their written notice specifically states that they are appealing the order of the trial court signed 2 March 1999. Because we find that respondents' appeal is premature, we must dismiss the appeal and remand the case for a final disposition.
N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7A–666 (1995) authorizes the appeal of any final order in a juvenile matter. It provides that notice of appeal must be entered either
in open court at the time of the hearing or in writing within 10 days after entry of the order. However, if no disposition is made within 60 days after entry of the order, written notice of appeal may be given within 70 days after such entry. A final order shall include:
․
(3) Any order of disposition after an adjudication that a juvenile is delinquent, undisciplined, abused, neglected, or dependent․
Id. (emphasis added). The statute does not authorize an appeal following the adjudicatory portion of the case. This appeal having been prematurely filed, must be dismissed and the case remanded to the trial court for entry of a dispositional order.
Appeal dismissed and case remanded for disposition.
HORTON, Judge.
Chief Judge EAGLES and Judge McGEE concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. COA99–731.
Decided: April 04, 2000
Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)