Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of North Carolina v. Elton Bernard VASS, Defendant.
Defendant Elton B. Vass pleaded guilty to felony flee/elude arrest with a motor vehicle in exchange for the dismissal of other charges. The trial court sentenced Defendant to ten to twenty-one months’ imprisonment, suspended for eighteen months of supervised probation, with an additional 150 days of imprisonment to be served at the discretion of his probation officer. On “page 2” of AOC-CR-603D, the trial court incorrectly marked box 1(A), requiring an active sentence, as opposed to box 1(D), allowing a sentence to be served at the direction of the probation officer.
Defendant filed a defective notice of appeal and subsequently filed a petition for writ of certiorari. In our discretion, we allow the petition and issue the writ of certiorari to review Defendant's prescribed probation.
Defendant contends, and the State concedes, that the trial court failed to check the proper box to make the record reflect the orally agreed-upon arrangement.
A clerical error is “[a]n error resulting from a minor mistake or inadvertence, esp[ecially] in writing or copying something on the record, and not from judicial reasoning or determination.” State v. Jarman, 140 N.C. App. 198, 202, 535 S.E.2d 875, 878 (2000) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “Generally, clerical errors include mistakes such as inadvertent checking of boxes on forms ․ or minor discrepancies between oral rulings and written orders.” In re D.D.J., 177 N.C. App. 441, 444, 628 S.E.2d 808, 811 (2006).
We agree that the trial court's judgment contains a clerical error, as described above. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court to correct the clerical error in Defendant's judgment, to reflect the agreed-upon arrangement.
REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR.
Report per Rule 30(e).
PER CURIAM.
Panel consisting of Judges COLLINS, FLOOD, and THOMPSON.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. COA24-409
Decided: October 01, 2024
Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)