Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of North Carolina v. Eleanor BLACK
Eleanor Black (Defendant) appeals from Judgment entered 29 August 2022 adjudicating her guilty of direct criminal contempt. Defendant was sentenced to two days of imprisonment and ordered to pay court costs and a fine of $50.00. Defendant filed written Notice of Appeal on 15 June 2022—twenty days after the entry of Judgment.
A defendant seeking to appeal a judgment “in a criminal action may take appeal by: (1) giving oral notice of appeal at trial, or (2) filing notice of appeal ․ within fourteen days after entry of the judgment or order[.]” N.C.R. App. P. 4(a) (2023). This Court lacks the jurisdiction to hear a defendant's appeal when the defendant has failed to timely file notice of appeal. State v. McCoy, 171 N.C. App. 636, 638, 615 S.E.2d 319, 320 (2005) (citations omitted). Here, Defendant failed to timely file Notice of Appeal. Further, Defendant's Notice of Appeal does not contain a certificate of service showing it was served on the State as required by Rule 4 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. As such, this Court is without jurisdiction to review her appeal.
Recognizing her written Notice of Appeal was untimely filed, Defendant filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari requesting this Court review the merits of her appeal pursuant to N.C.R. App. P. 21. In her Petition, Defendant summarily contends the trial court erred in adjudicating her guilty of direct criminal contempt because “the evidence showed she did not willfully or intentionally interrupt, disrespect, or interfere with the process of the ․ hearing but was instead merely trying to communicate with her counsel during that hearing.” Having reviewed both Defendant's Petition and her arguments contained in briefing, we further conclude Defendant has failed to demonstrate sufficient merit in her appeal to warrant the issuance of the writ of certiorari. See State v. Grundler, 251 N.C. 177, 189, 111 S.E.2d 1, 9 (1959) (“A petition for writ must show merit or that error was probably committed below.”). Accordingly, we deny her Petition and dismiss this appeal.
DISMISSED.
Panel consisting of:
Report per Rule 30(e).
PER CURIAM.
Judges ZACHARY, HAMPSON, and FLOOD.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. COA23-102
Decided: September 19, 2023
Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)