Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MARY K. EMBLETON, Petitioner and Appellant, v. JAMES L. LARSON and JOE BRIGGS, in their official capacities as CASCADE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; and CASCADE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Montana, Respondents and Appellees.
¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court Internal Operating Rules, this case is decided by memorandum opinion and shall not be cited and does not serve as precedent. Its case title, cause number, and disposition shall be included in this Court's quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports.
¶2 Petitioner and Appellant Mary K. Embleton (Embleton) filed a petition for injunctive relief against Cascade County (County) in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County. Embleton is apparently aggrieved by an alleged $54.00 increase in her solid waste district assessments. She requested an expedited hearing on her claims. After full briefing, the District Court denied her request without a hearing, determined that her claims were not meritorious, and dismissed and closed the case.
¶3 The County, while averring that the court was correct on the merits, represents that the issuance by the District Court of a final judgment dismissing the case without a hearing was premature. The County requests that this matter be remanded, pursuant to Davis v. Westphal, 2017 MT 276, 389 Mont. 251, 405 P.3d 73, for a hearing.
¶4 Based on the County's concession, the District Court's judgment dismissing Embleton's claims is reversed. This matter is remanded for the District Court to conduct a hearing.
¶5 We have determined to decide this case pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c) of our Internal Operating Rules, which provides for memorandum opinions. In the opinion of the Court, the case presents a question controlled by settled law or by the clear application of applicable standards of review.
¶6 Reversed and remanded.
LAURIE McKINNON
We Concur: CORY J. SWANSON JAMES JEREMIAH SHEA BETH BAKER INGRID GUSTAFSON
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: DA 25-0163
Decided: December 16, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of Montana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)