Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Mark A. BARNETT, Appellant.
ORDER
Mark Barnett appeals his conviction for one count of assault in the first degree. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing the prosecutor to engage in ad hominem attacks against the defense attorney. Because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose, a memorandum explaining the reasons for this decision is provided to the parties. The conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Per Curiam:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: WD87972
Decided: August 25, 2026
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)