Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Harry Dale FOREMAN, Jr., Appellant.
ORDER
Harry D. Foreman, Jr. (“Foreman”) appeals his convictions of one count of trafficking drugs in the second degree, six counts of delivery of a controlled substance, two counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of keeping or maintaining a public nuisance, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Vernon County (“trial court”). Foreman raises two points on appeal, arguing in both that “[t]he trial court plainly erred by abandoning its duty of neutrality and injecting itself into the proceedings when the judge, not the prosecutor, objected” during trial. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).1
FOOTNOTES
1. All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2022).
PER CURIAM:
Was this helpful?
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)