STATE v. HICKMAN (2023)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stephen Guy HICKMAN, Appellant.

WD 85022

Decided: February 14, 2023

Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, W. Douglas Thomson, Judge and Janet Sutton, Judge

Julia Rives, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Jedd C. Schneider, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

ORDER

Stephen Hickman (“Hickman”) appeals from a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree stalking and sentencing him to four years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Hickman argues that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to present evidence of several prior interactions between Hickman and the victim, A.G., where Hickman assaulted A.G. Hickman also asserts that the trial court erred in allowing the State to present evidence that Hickman had an additional pending charge for assaulting A.G. at the time of this trial. We affirm. A published opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum that sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law