Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.R.A.L., Appellant. (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the INTEREST OF: J.R.L. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.R.A.L., Appellant.

WD 85182

Decided: August 30, 2022

Before Division One: Janet Sutton, Presiding Judge, and Alok Ahuja and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

Robert J. Seek, Eldon, MO, Attorney for Respondent. Kimberly Kollmeyer, Jefferson City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Daniel Finder, Jefferson City, MO, Guardian ad litem.

Order

C.R.A.L. (Mother) appeals the trial court's judgment terminating her parental rights to her daughter, J.R.L. (Child). In her sole point on appeal, Mother claims that the trial court failed to make certain statutorily required findings regarding termination of her parental rights. Mother does not argue that the evidence was insufficient to establish grounds for terminating her parental rights; she argues only that the findings contained in the court's judgment did not explicitly address all statutorily required factors. Because Mother failed to preserve her claim for appellate review, we affirm the trial court's judgment.¹ Rule 84.16(b).

FOOTNOTES

1. The parental rights of Child's biological father, R.W.L. Jr. (Father), also were terminated by the judgment; we do not address the termination of Father's rights because he is not a party to this appeal.

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law