In the Interest of: J.K. and R.K., Respondents; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, Respondents, v. G.K. and T.K., Appellants. (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the Interest of: J.K. and R.K., Respondents; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, Respondents, v. G.K. and T.K., Appellants.

WD 85153 Consolidated with 85168

Decided: August 30, 2022

Before Division Four: Gary D. Witt, Chief Judge, Presiding, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, MO and Anastacia Renae Adamson, Kansas City, MO, for respondents. Tracy L. Spradlin, Kansas City, MO and Kole Steven Masters, Kansas City, MO, for appellants.

ORDER

G.K. and T.K. appeal the judgments of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri (“trial court”) terminating their parental rights to J.K. and R.K. Finding no error we affirm the judgments of the trial court. Rule 84.16 (b). A memorandum explaining the bases of our decision has been provided to the parties.

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network