JACKSON v. STATE (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jerel JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 84404

Decided: May 10, 2022

Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

Katharine P. Curry, for Appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

ORDER

Jerel Jackson appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. In two points on appeal, Jackson claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion. Jackson claims appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to raise on appeal that the trial court erred in denying Jackson's motion to exclude testimony and for sanctions due to the State's failure to timely disclose impeachment information including a co-defendant's guilty plea transcript and a crime lab report. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network